Writing a research paper methodswriting the discussion section is complete, you can move onto the next stage, wrapping up the paper with a focused conclusion..Wilson mizner: "if you steal from one author it's plagiarism; if you steal from many it's research. my goal with this article is to help you understand the characteristics of a good discussion section. if the discussion is neither stimulating nor convincing about the meaning and importance of the findings, it does not really matter how the experiments were performed or what results were reported. article is a part of the guide:Select from one of the other courses available:Experimental research.
How to Write Guide: Sections of the Paperthe results of the previous research help you to interpret your own findings? a previous article on the introduction section of a scientific paper (1), i discussed how this section could be envisioned as having the shape of a cone or funnel. second, the restatement at the beginning of the discussion must match the statement of purpose in the introduction. this page on your website:Writing a discussion section is where you really begin to add your interpretations to the work. my previous article on the introduction section of a scientific paper (1), i talked about how the story becomes clearer if transition words and phrases are used.
the second sentence of their discussion thus contains 2 answers (boldface text) that clearly match the original questions in both wording and key terms. this was across-sectional research design that relied on survey data.” the discussion is your opportunity to make a good final impression. that no significance is not the same as no difference, and you can begin to explain this in your discussion section. some journals include an actual summary or conclusion section at the end of published articles, where these summary points belong.
narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with. this analogy helps to emphasize the need for the first paragraph of the discussion to be very specific and focused. scope of the discussion should then be broadened by describing how your results and your interpretation of the results are supported by, consistent with, or related to the results (evidence) from other published studies. they also serve the same purpose in the discussion section. discussion section is not always about what you found, but what you did not find, and how you deal with that.