Ma dissertation marking criteria

  • Ma dissertation marking criteria

    nevertheless, even such a dissertation does need to make use of academic sources in order to introduce the topic and give it a sound theoretical framework. the combination of these difficulties in applying the criteria resulted in holistic rather criterion-based marking, where assessors ‘had a feel’ for the grade a dissertation deserved and manipulated the comments against the criteria in order to arrive at the ‘right’ mark. thirdly, there was no way of weighting the different criteria. dissertation will be well-presented, making full and appropriate use of scholarly apparatus (including the referencing of primary and/or archival sources). when supervisors and internal examiners met to discuss the final mark, it was therefore often a process of negotiation, including special pleading for consideration of factors not included in the criteria, for example, how hard the student had worked, how conscientious they had been and so on. in terms of research, the dissertation should clearly derive from a well-defined and identifiable primary source base. it became clear that a variety of approaches are adopted, ranging from global assessment where dissertations are assessed for a general impression of their adequacy (and the criteria are used as a sort of checklist to ensure that all areas have been considered), to analytic assessment, where work is examined against each criterion to which a proportion of the total mark has previously been allocated, the marks then being added up to arrive at a final mark (mcdonald and sansom, 1979). the new approach used a grid, and distinguished between first- and second- order criteria.
  • How to write a literature review for a dissertation
  • How to write a master s thesis pdf
  • Master s thesis introduction length
  • Thesis paper define
  • Dissertation binding london same day service

Doctoral thesis cloud computing

Masters dissertation marking

this was compounded by an absence of grade descriptors against each criterion, leaving the question of the difference between different grades of dissertation very much open to question. five second-order criteria were then developed, each with its own grade descriptors. in submitting your dissertation, you will agree the declaration, as the statement is included on the moodle turnitin link., college frameworkpostgraduate taught, code of practice for research governance and dissertation framework. a dissertation cannot be awarded a class above that given to this criterion, whatever the performance in the other categories. a dissertation was strong in some areas and weaker in others, the final grade rather depended on the particular academic values of the assessors. each assessor should mark the dissertation and complete the form fully. examiners will consider all of these areas when they mark the dissertation. Writing up research,

Masters dissertation marking criteria

the argument offered in the dissertation should be sustained and convincing, offer perceptive and independent insights, and demonstrate an ability to handle historical concepts and methods with confidence. dissertation requires risk assessment as well as ethical clearance before the research is actually undertaken. we developed a set of criteria against which to judge the dissertation learning outcomes (see appendix 2). various meetings, colleagues have commented that the method used last year of blind marking meant that they were unable to gain from the meeting with the other assessor to agree a mark. a dissertation marked in this range will in addition push the boundaries of existing historiography and suggest major revisions to our understanding of the topic studied. the second-order criteria are designed to pick up other features of the dissertation which relate to the learning outcomes. table of contents (if applicable):please do try to structure your dissertation along numbered sections; it makes it a lot easier for you to write, because it helps you structure your thoughts – and it also makes it easier for your examiners to read it and follow your train of thought. examiners will consider all of these areas when they mark the dissertation. Purpose of an academic research paper

King's College London - Marking Criteria, Taught Postgraduate

dissertation in this range may have ignored presentational guidelines and the conventions of academic writing (including grammar and spelling). as assessment form was developed from the grid (see appendix 4), which lists the criteria on the left hand side and then has room for typed comments against each criterion on the right. there should be some attempt to situate the dissertation within a wider scholarly literature but the reading may be relatively narrow. next cohort of students will be invited to engage with the assessment criteria through workshops at which they will be asked to use the criteria to assess work previously submitted and assessed. primary sources will be thin, tangential, or inappropriately chosen and so fail to support the argument put forward in the dissertation. it presents a literature-based approach to developing assessment criteria, related to the learning outcomes of the dissertation modules. there should be some attempt to situate the dissertation within a wider scholarly literature but the reading may be relatively narrow. of completed formsassessors’ reactions and experiencesissues arisingfuture plans for developmentconclusionsbiographycontact detailsreferences:learning outcomesknowledge and understandingprofessional/disciplinary skillsoriginal assessment criteriapresentation:structure:literature review:analysis and evaluation:conclusions:msc dissertation assessment marking criteria and grid.

Dissertation Marking Criteria (HST6560) - Marking Criteria

main body of a dissertation (excluding footnotes and list of references) should be double-spaced, using clear fonts such as calibri. a process was put in place which required the submitted work to be independently assessed against the criteria by the supervisor and an internally appointed examiner. what has resulted from this exercise is a heightened interest in discussion of the assessment of the dissertation that we hope will result in improvements to the grid and a greater feeling of shared ownership after meetings at the end of this term. copy of your dissertation should be submitted via the the relevant moodle turnitin link by 11.: should contain all works cited in your dissertation and none that you have not used. criteria have been reworked to try to make a more logical collection in each category and grading guidelines for each criterion are suggested. dissertation in this range may have ignored presentational guidelines and the conventions of academic writing (including grammar and spelling). ma dissertation is about showing how well you can independently do research on a particular topic, including a theoretical background.

Masters Dissertation / Research Project Assessment Marking

Developing assessment criteria for Masters-level dissertations

unlike a ug dissertation, an ma dissertation should be of publishable quality and therefore fulfil the requirements of a good piece of research. the table of contents should also include the bibliography and any appendices of your dissertation. dissertations need to be double-spaced and there should be a generous margin on both sides. are encouraged to make use of the support for essay and dissertation writing available from learning and teaching development. a dissertation must receive a grade for at least three of these five criteria that matches the grade achieved in the first-order criteria in order to be awarded a final grade at that level., d and webster, f (1998) the assessment of undergraduate dissertations in the school of social sciences and law oxford brookes occasional paper. literature emphasises the importance of the ownership and shared understanding of any criteria used for assessment both among assessing staff (saunders and davis, 1998; pilkington and winch, 2000) and students (price and donovan, 2003). the dissertation will have an identifiable and well-focused primary source base and the candidate will make effective use of this primary material in presenting his/her argument. Thesis and dissertation

ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK

a dissertation marked in this range will in addition push the boundaries of existing historiography and suggest major revisions to our understanding of the topic studied. ma dissertation is less about showing how well you can deal with foreign language material, however, if you do have the capability of reading research in the language of your area, you are strongly recommended to do so. by submitting the dissertation on moodle, you agree to have read and understood regulation 17. the dissertation should advance a case, but the argument may be more mechanical or show a tendency to description. informal discussion with colleagues suggested that there was a shared view that in addition to specific criteria such as the quality and range of the literature review, the methodological approach and so on, there was a holistic criterion that reflected the strength of the overall argument, the coherence of the dissertation and the level of critical awareness which was crucial in distinguishing between the different grades of the final assessment of the dissertation. in common with other taught masters level programmes, a required component is the dissertation. secondly, the dissertation is an extended piece of work (15,000 words); therefore it is likely the quality may vary between the different parts, again making an overall judgement difficult. dissertation marked as a 'pass' will have an identifiable primary source base but the relationship between the sources and the thesis may not be well developed.

MA Marking Criteria Items of coursework and the dissertation are all ,

MA Dissertation Guidelines | SOAS University of London

in the vast majority of cases there was also agreement about the grades awarded for each of the second-order criteria. the dissertation is widely viewed as the culmination of a students achievements: a piece of independent research in which knowledge, understanding, originality of thought, ability to analyse, evaluate and apply subject-specific theories and concepts is demonstrated. in terms of research, the dissertation should clearly derive from a well-defined and identifiable primary source base. problems were associated with the use of these criteria, many of which are also revealed in the literature on assessment.. a dissertation on the usage of language in relation to emoticons in blogs or chat fora would naturally need to refer to the webpages in question). it identifies the features of dissertations which present difficulties in the assessment process and considers the problems faced by assessors, relating these difficulties to the literature. the first-order criterion plays a key role in arriving at the final grade for the dissertation. dissertation marked as a 'pass' will have an identifiable primary source base but the relationship between the sources and the thesis may not be well developed.

UNIVERSITY OF READING MARKING CRITERIA AND

common with other modules the assessment strategy for the dissertation module measures students’ achievement of the learning outcomes (see appendix 1), or at least that is what we told ourselves. criteria for written examinations and coursework for all taught postgraduate degree programmes. the ltd offers on-line help, workshops and one-to-one tutorials which cover many aspects of academic writing relevant for ma dissertations. (1998) the use of assessment criteria to ensure consistency of marking: some implications for good practice. method of blind double marking was continued, with each assessor completing the assessment form fully, assigning a grade to each of the criteria. will have a form which is blank apart from the list of criteria down the left hand side and will insert in the boxes the grade and the justifications for the grade for each criterion using the generic guidelines. the dissertation should be competently presented but may not entirely follow the guidelines set. with dissertation guidelines, correctly referenced, complies with specified length and submitted on time.

reported some initial difficulties of interpretation and understanding of the role of the first-order criterion and some assessors did not at first insert grades into the second-order criteria and had to be asked to go back and do this before meeting to agree the final mark. from discussion with colleagues there seemed to be two major difficulties:The descriptors in each of the criteria boxes were not exclusive so it was sometimes difficult to avoid crediting, say structure in several different places. dissertations will receive a lower mark when they are poorly referenced even if the research was original. however, the process of blind double marking (where the mark awarded by each assessor is unknown, and the final mark mediated by the module leader) is good practice and valued by the external examiner. in order to overcome the problems of holistic marking (i know a distinction when i see it), the criteria carry different weightings. second order criteria are designed to pick up specific features of the dissertation which contribute to its overall coherence. dissertation will be well-presented, making full and appropriate use of scholarly apparatus (including the referencing of primary and/or archival sources). additionally, it was felt that the criteria themselves were not significantly changed, rather, they were simply grouped together differently, and of course there was the prioritising of the first-order criterion.

Marking Criteria - UEA grid was produced (appendix 3) which reworked the existing criteria in order to produce more logical groupings within each criterion category.: anything that is unavailable to your examiners but vital to the understanding of your dissertation can be put in an appendix – if you are referring to it in your actual text. of these features present particular difficulties in the assessment of the dissertation. a dissertation should receive a grade for three of these that reflects the standard achieved of the first order criterion in order to achieve that mark. the dissertation is the culmination of a years study and is intended to be a vehicle which students can use to demonstrate their achievements. dissertation in this range may have ignored presentational guidelines and the conventions of academic writing (including grammar and spelling). the argument offered in the dissertation should be sustained and convincing, offer perceptive and independent insights, and demonstrate an ability to handle historical concepts and methods with confidence. this means that a dissertation cannot be awarded a class of degree mark above that given to this category, whatever the performance in the other categories.

feel that the new scheme more accurately reflects the learning outcomes for the dissertation module and that the new assessment grid makes the criteria for assessment and the level of achievement for each grade much more transparent. literature on the development and use of assessment criteria was examined for examples of good practice, and for the discussion of experiences in other subject areas and other educational institutions. we hope that by actively engaging with the criteria they will come to a better understanding of what is required for the dissertation and that this will enhance their performance. finally, since the dissertation is a blend of subject-specific and generic skills, the assessor must try to distinguish between these and decide on the relative weight to attach to each. (2003) improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes assessment and evaluation in higher education (awaiting publication). however, this did not occur as there was insufficient time before the current round of assessment, and the module leader for the dissertation was so dissatisfied with the existing framework that it was decided to operationalise the new one straightaway. together the findings of primary research and literature review to develop conclusions about the subject and the contribution of the dissertation to knowledge in the subject area. ma dissertation should have:A cover sheet containing title of the dissertation, your name, student id, degree, the date of submission and the word count.

paper discusses the development of appropriate and effective criteria for the assessment of masters dissertations. is better to print out anything you might want to use immediately because it could be deleted as you progress with your dissertation. proceduresmsc dissertations in hotel, travel and tourism management assessment grid. guidelines provide you with specific information on the use of sources, referencing and citation for ma dissertations in the faculty of languages and cultures, which are likely to include a certain amount of foreign language data and material. dissertation in this range may have ignored presentational guidelines and the conventions of academic writing (including grammar and spelling). has been clear for some time that the criteria we use to mark dissertations needed reworking. this was clearly not ideal, however, and more widespread discussions are planned for later this term in which assessors will explore their understanding and use of the criteria. firstly, the requirement to demonstrate the abilities to analyse, evaluate, and to present a coherent extended argument means that the dissertation cannot be marked simply by assigning marks to each section (e.

secondly, the different sections of criteria were not mutually exclusive, which meant that some aspects of the dissertation were assessed under more than one heading (for example structure appears in several places). the word count given is a maximum and you may be penalised for submitting dissertations which are too long. paper discusses the development of assessment criteria for the masters programmes in international hotel and tourism management and in international travel and tourism management at oxford brookes university. the dissertation will have an identifiable and well-focused primary source base and the candidate will make effective use of this primary material in presenting his/her argument. primary sources will be thin, tangential, or inappropriately chosen and so fail to support the argument put forward in the dissertation., other similar reference sites as well as blogs or chat rooms are not to be used in a dissertation. should you experience any technical issues with turnitin, please email one copy of your dissertation to lcdissertations@soas. the dissertation should be competently presented but may not entirely follow the guidelines set.

apartmentsdirect.ie Sitemap